Hillary was at it again, this time beratting a would be voter for questioning her with what must be a plant! Apparently, the question had to do with her recent vote for Bush to call the Iranian Revolutionary guard a terrorist organization and how that would give the current administration the go ahead to go to war against Iran. Instead of responding calmly to the question, Clinton responded

by telling the questioner “the premise of the question is wrong,” and argued the measure calls for the terrorist label so that sanctions can be imposed. The sanctions, she also said, will in turn “send a clear message to the leadership” and lead to stronger diplomatic efforts.

The Democratic presidential front-runner then concluded by suggesting the question was planted, saying, “somebody obviously sent it to you.”

She certainly does not handle direct questions well and if this is how she responds to criticism, imagine her in the Oval Office. Why, there wouldn’t be a news paper or blog or news program left.

Also in the news, John Edwards has compared Hillary to Howard Dean in the ‘04 election. See how well he’s doing now?

Also, clinton has apparently added Sandy Berger to her advisers. Berger was convicted of taking and destroying classified documents from the National Archives before going to testify before the 911 Committee. Does anyone in the Clinton Campaign not find a problem with this? And Hillary has been endorsed by Muslim Terrorists. How good is that for a campaign?

I think the one thing Edwards, Obama and the whole republican field have going for them is that they are not Hillary Clinton. It might be fun to watch as her campaign slowly implodes.